Go,See,Talk!
3 guys talk movies, music and more

Jan
29

Hello World, Marc Here:

Tomorrow will be one of the biggest days of my entire life.  Yes, that’s right, on Saturday at 7:30, I will be getting married!!  Boy I can’t believe I’m at that point in my life.  After that, my “wife” and I will be heading to Australia for 2 weeks to enjoy our Honeymoon.  Oh, it’s going to be sooo sweet!!

Boy it’s really an exciting time for me and so I felt like sharing with all you G-S-T readers.  With that said, this will be that last post until I return mid-February.  That is unless Rob and Pete get off their asses and start contributing…yeah, don’t bet on that:P  See you all in 2 weeks!!!

Jan
28

I think it’s fair to say that a great many people overlook this film and it wasn’t really popular when it came out, but over the years I have learned to love Hook. Steven Spielberg can almost do no wrong and while this is a departure from the actioners he is known to helm, this still had its fair share of kid friendly swashbuckling. Talk about an ensemble cast, this film has acting talent in spades…

In Hook, a grown up Peter Banning (really, the real Peter Pan) has grown up in the real world after being adopted as an orphan. As an adult, Peter has forgotten all the memories from his time in Never Never Land. Peter, on a (perhaps fated) trip back to England is visiting Wendy Darling. His purpose is to honor her for her lifetime of raising orphans by opening a hospital in her name. While at that dinner event, Captain Hook has kidnapped Peter’s two children and ransomed them. Peter, so far removed from his past life, slowly starts to come to terms with what is going on, who has his children, where he must go to save them, and finally that he really is the Peter Pan.

When one thinks of Robin Williams, “wacky” is probably the first word that comes to mind. Yet, thinking about casting, he was really the only choice for this movie because if there was truly a person who never grew up, it is Williams. Sure he has had some fine dramatic performances and wowed audiences and critics with his range but this role suited him amazingly well. Sure this wasn’t a vehicle for him to channel all his over the top antics but he was able to play the line between adult and kid pretty damn well.

Now if Robin Williams wasn’t enough of a shot into left field for a casting decision, how about Dustin Hoffman? I mean he just killed the role and, aside from Bob Hoskins as Smee, was the best part of the movie. This wasn’t Hoffman’s best performance by far, but I still think he delivered the goods. He came across so likeable even as a villain that I would be all for another film, even though he was ambiguously eaten by the crock at the end. While I’m sure everyone (both viewers and the actors in the movie) realized some lines were cheesy, he gave it the performance a fine run through even if it seemed he was dumbing himself down to play Hook. This is still a kids movie after all, so some leeway had to be given to allow this movie and his role in it to get a passing grade from an older viewing audience.

While I consider John Williams as probably my all time favorite film composer, this score was both fantastical, inspiring magical and touching. Never one to give anything less than a top-tier performance Williams gave an incredibly unique score to the film which fit so well with the theme of the movie (could he do anything but?) making Hook not just a visual feast but an auditory one as well. While I value Williams’ scores, this, much like Hoffman wasn’t the crown jewel in his resume but there were some parts of the score (namely the sequence where Peter finally remembers who he is) that were beyond brilliant and showcased Williams’ ability to continually surpass his own achievements in music.

Now, I do adore this film, but I do find one gripe I need to bring up. I never, never, never, never liked Rufio, neither as ther character or the actor. Something has always seemed off. Be it his brazen attitude, his arrogant demeanor, the fact that he can’t act, or that he really does look like a “skunk head with too much moose” his whole character was a real tough sell. However over the years (many, many yeas in fact), I have kind of accepted him as part of the movie and have let my dislike with him go…basically the same way I feel about Ghostbusters II.

Watching this movie was like watching a parade go by. There were so many wonderful things to look at, the colors were vivid and the music got you into what was going on. Amidst the cornucopia of great scenry and screen elements, there’s two things that really caught my eye and made me do a double take. The first is a rather obscure cameo from Glen Close (of all people) playing a lowly pirate (of all parts). If you didn’t notice her before that’s OK, she doesn’t really look like herself. It’s kind of like an on-screen easter egg if you’re able to recognize her. Also Phil Collins makes a very small appearance if you didn’t catch him either. I don’t want to spoil those scenes for you so I leave it to you all to watch it again to find them both…or for the impatient viewers, just try a YouTube search.

When this was released on DVD years ago it was one of the first DVD titles to feature an anamorphic transfer. That was like the HD of the day. While the visuals themselves may have seemed vert set oriented and implausible, I still consider it the eye candy of yesteryear. I enjoy this movie for its looks, the acting, the incredible score and the bookoo acting talent that brought it all together.

Now as a bit of parting thanks, I do have to acknowledge Pogomix.net (who are known to make awesome videos using nothing but clips, sounds and music from the movie in question) for their recent ‘Hook’ remixed music video. It was the inspiration to get me to watch and write-up this old favorite of mine. Check out the video and enjoy…

All in all, Hook is a reminder for us to get back in-touch with the kid in all of us. It’s a fun ride and really makes you believe in the “second star to the right” and all that goes with it.

G-S-T Seal of Approval: GRANTED

Jan
27

For years I have been a huge (and yet still increasingly interested) fan of British comedy. I much prefer the subtle and quasi dry humor to the slapstick and over-the-top humor that dominates American cinema. There’s just something about a joke when it can be done with less animation but still evoke gut busting laughter. Growing up with Life of Brian, I guess I could call that (and other Monty Python creations) the “School of Dry Knocks”. Moving on to A Bit of Fry and Laurie, throw in some of The Office, a dash of Guy Ritchie and finish up with a huge helping of Little Britain, I am completely sold on British humor and my thirst has yet to be quenched. After seeing a trailer for The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy years ago, I figured this was right up my alley…and I was not disappointed (especially with narration from Stephen Fry).

Lowly Authur Dent lived a life unsuspecting that his world was no more extravagant than his humble surroundings and that it didn’t hold more potential than a pint of lager. Just as his house is set to be demolished for a planned bypass, he and his friend Ford (who to Dent is unaware is actually a humanoid alien) escape Earth’s demolition as his planet similarly is an obstacle in the way of an Inter-Galactic bypass. Funny coincidence huh? While Arthur is coming to grips with everything, Ford presents him with the “Hitchhiker’s Guide” to get him acclimated to the wonders of the cosmos as they prepare to set out on the journey of a lifetime.

What I was most excited about seeing in this movie is was that I really couldn’t expect anything. The plot was so random and “out there” that I couldn’t tell what was going to happen next. From singing dolphins to Vogon poetry readings, to John Malkovitch and ultimately the Improbability Drive, this movie not only kept me interested but also scratching my head. But whereas I may have been confused and lost as to how they came up with what was on screen, I found comfort in Stephen Fry’s narration to find me safely though to the end of the film. Each narrative sequence with Fry served 2 purposes: 1. I recalled his many hilarious skits in A Bit of Fry and Laurie and 2. His delivery has this dignified tone that even though you know you are hearing something so fictionally ludicrous, you started to feel like there’s still some credibility to the subject matter.

I guess the first high point (aside from Fry obviously) in this film was the cast. Not only were the lines they read incredibly funny, but each actor delivered them with such style that you’d think they were born to play the part. Martin Freeman played Tim in The Office and while his role here was very similar he still got me laughing with just the looks he gave. Odd choice casting Sam Rockwell but his turn as Zephod was wacky and if I didn’t see him as Crewman number 6 in Galaxy Quest, I would have never know he had a talent for zany antics. Although, if you think of British humor being mostly cut, dray and very funny, he had to be animated as it provided enough contrast to sell his jokes but also appeal to American audiences. To me, I think he had the best overall performance of the movie.

And who knew Mos Def could act??  I didn’t but after this I saw him in 2 other films(16 Blocks and Journey to the End of the Night) and it really got me thinking that I have to keep an eye out for him in the future. So he could act…and he was also funny. Terrific combo and again, it really surprised me. Now if you’ve read any of my recent Off the Shelf posts (namely Robin Hood Prince of Thieves, and Galaxy Quest) you’ll know that I am increasingly fond of Alan Rickman. Well he, as did Helen Mirren, only provided his voice talents for (robot) but had probably the funniest lines of the entire film. God, that dead pan delivery just slayed me. The only person who didn’t pull their weight, and has yet to in any movie I’ve seen, is Zooey Deschanel. How does she land parts other than the fact she’s pretty damn cute. Unfortunately, she has zero contributions to this film and I really could have done without her. Lastly, and I don’t want to ruin it for you if you haven’t seen it, but Bill Nighy comes in for a cameo and with his trademark quirky acting quality, just steals some scenes and is a welcomed addition to this rather varied and yet likeable cast.

I haven’t listened to the original radio series and I didn’t know anything of the history of it before this recent adaptation (or is it a big budget retelling? I don’t know) but I thoroughly enjoyed myself. Sometimes having little to know knowledge of the original source material can be refreshing as it lets me go in without prior preconceptions. That said, ignorance is bliss and this movie just killed me. Brits do some of the best quirky, oddball and really “out there” humor (Mighty Boosh anyone??) and this film was no exception. I mean who would have thought to make doors “sigh” as the opened, and who would have thought that would be increasingly funny? Who cares why it works so well right? All that matter is that it does work. Even cyclical humor just got me eveytime.

Although I commended the Brits for existing in a realm above slapstick, maybe it’s just me being an American, but a dabble in those waters never hurts as long as it is selective and tasteful. Case in point, probably the funniest sequence in the film was the sequence when they crash-land on Vogon 6 and have to make it to the city without “thinking”. Painful for the characters=funny for me. I’ll take that any day of the week as long as the rest of the jokes are good, old sophisticatedly British.

G-S-T Seal of Approval: GRANTED

Jan
27

Well after what seems like entirely too long, G-S-T foreign correspondent Rob has made it back to our fair country to grace us with his presence.  The reason??  He’s here for my wedding!!!  That’s right, my wedding is this Saturday and both Rob and Pete will be groomsmen.  I’m so very glad he got to make it back for this.  So what was nearly an eternity (last time he was here was October 2008), the G-S-T trio is back for a limited engagement.

Oh, I sure wish there were karaoke bars in Dallas to compare with the caliber of high-end karaoke bars in Tokyo.  Rob, will you settle for a dive bar called Rock N Roll Bar??  We could swap the L’s and the R’s for you to make you feel at home…

Provided we get a respectable photo of the three of us, I’ll post something from our night out…which will actually be my bachelor party…so maybe nix the picture idea:)  Anyway, on behalf of myself, Pete and all our readers, let’s welcome Rob back to the states!!  Yosoko, Rob-san!!

Jan
26

Does anyone recall that scene in Fellowship of the Ring, where Baromir has just died and they are about to send him over the falls? Stop right there…does anyone see a problem with this picture? Well I do.

First off, imagine yourself in Aragorn and Gimli’s shoes (or boots rather) I know you just had a huge forest battle with some Orcs and you probably are saying, “well we don’t have time to bury him“, but really? Over the falls? Now this is just one instance where something in a movie sounds like a good idea or something very dignified…but it’s not. Here’s my thoughts on why:

Boromir is the son of a king, I know they can’t take him home, explain to his father what happened, then come all the way back and keep on their journey…or course not, you’d lose pace and that sequence would be boring, plus the movie is long enough already. Anyway, so the idea is to get him all pretty, put him in a boat, put his head on a little pillow using his shield as a headboard and then?? Yup, “Man Overboard!!“.

Not only do I see that as an undignified way of dealing with the departed (especially for royalty), but let’s follow this a little further. What happens after they push the boat off the shore and it heads for the crest of the falls?? The boat and the well-positioned little man fall an unknown height (though judging by the size of the falls, you can probably guess somewhere in the hundreds of feet) and they consider that a burial?

But think about this, Baromir falls, lands, gets beat to almost ribbons, the boat is shattered and his personables are scattered at the foot of the falls. Now what happens when a body is left in water deteriorating? Yup, contamination. Any thirsty traveler who comes somewhere near the foot of the falls will undoubtedly (for some period of time) have to contend with contaminated water. And contend isn’t really the right word to use because that makes you think he knows about the dirty water, which he doesn’t – that’s outright arbitrary murder on Aragorn’s part if you ask me. So the thirsty traveler imbibes the water and wonders why he’s dying in bed a few days later…same goes for assorted animal life.

Now on to his precious (get it? little LotR humor for you) personal effects. They sent him over the falls with all his “fancy” stuff. At the bottom of the falls, provided it’s salvageable, you’ve probably got some lucky little kid or thief/scrounger hitting the jackpot. “Look at this sweet sword I found guys“. Yeah explain that to Denethor when and if you see him. “Sorry, your son is dead and we sent him over the falls“…”His stuff?…um, yeah that went over too….< imitates dropping noise and finishes with resounding boom noise>”

Anyway, that’s my Random Thought for you…anyone have anything similar they want to discuss?? Does anyone think this scene (which to be fair was taken from the book) played out OK?  Am I just waaay over thinking it all??

Jan
25

Hello World, Marc Here:

Just wanted to throw you a couplew tasty tidbits on this slow moving Monday. From Yahoo! Movies, here are 2 posters for the upcoming M. Night Shaylaman adaptation of The Last Airbender


While I can’t claim to know much about the show, I do think the teaser that came out last year plus the few set shots that have surfaced here and there look intriguing. Now that I think of it, we’ve seen surprisingly little for something that’s supposed to come out 6 months from now.

Anyway, I am in the camp that believes M. Night is poised for a comeback after Lady in the Water and The Happening. They were definitely strike one and strike two. Here’s hoping he doesn’t “Strike Out” and that he hits this out of the park.

Although there isn’t really a great example out there which should give any fan proof that a live action adaptation of a cartoon will work, I’m still pulling for this one. The Last Airbender is set to be released on July 2nd 2010. What do you fans think? Anyone excited or hopeful for this?


Jan
25

When Arnold Schwarzenegger first hit cinema screens in a big way it was with two undeniable iconic roles. “By Krum” you had Conan (an improvement over the equally poorly spoken and awful Hercules in New York), but you also had The Terminator, another in his line of minimally versed characters but this time playing a cybernetic organism (CSM-101 or T-800). After that, “Ah-nuld” and his life would never be the same.

Being an 8 time Mr. Olympia winner will never bring him as much recognition or lasting cultural resonance than with the three famous words “I’ll be back” or when Conan tells his master what is best in life…”To crush you enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women“.  While both series had incredible first installments, only T2 proved to be the shining glimmer of hope beyond that of their legendary inceptors. But thinking about the “Barbarian” vs. a “Cyborg”…I bet that battle could truly go on for ages…

Jan
22

Well it’s a slow going Friday and after a whole week of work and non-stop painting in the evening, the lack of sleep is getting to me. So to illicit a chuckle, get the blood going and wake my tired ass up, here’s some humorous videos for your enjoyment.

The first two are from a Japanese TV show (that I still can’t pronounce) and are pretty clever…

This last one will hopefully get the biggest laugh from this post. It’s just so damn cute and funny…look at that a double bonus!!

I can almost imagine him smacking a baby Uma Thurman in Quentin Tarantino’s latest, “Kill Billy“…that extra ‘Y’ was added to sell the idea that much further. That’s right, always thinking of ways to impress you all:)

Jan
22

This past weekend I was watching Star Trek on Blu-Ray (which is jaw-dropping btw). While I just love that movie I couldn’t help but think, more than a few times, of how spot on the Galaxy Quest spoof was to the entire Star Trek franchise. After the movie ended, and I swore that I was a confirmed ‘neo’Trekkie’ I put Galaxy Quest in for a spin and laughed my ass off. For starters, this was no spoof in the vein of Airplane! or even those abysmal “Scary”, “Date”, “Disaster” Movies that studios term as spoof either. Not this was almost an outright homage sprinkled with witty humor and fine acting. I have always loved this movie yet not seen it in a while so this was a welcomed viewing for sure.

If there’s one thing I’ve learned from watching this it is definitely ”Never Give Up, Never Surrender” especially if you have fallen so far from the spotlight, have become a joke and your entire existence is pathetic at best. Well never fear, you may one day be needed to help an alien race protect their way of life and save their species from extinction…with your acting prowess. Such is the case of the Tim Allen as he, still fresh from the success of Home Improvement and Pixar’s Toy Story leads his unlikely (and bored) troupe of fellow has-been actors to either certain doom or, (bit of a long shot) victory.

While this movie is supposed to be a satire, I really believe this film is much smarter that it appears on the surface. First off, you don’t get the likes of Sigourney Weaver and especailly not Alan Rickman if this was going to be some half-assed spoof. This film had style from the very first scene…well not the very first scene but you know what I mean. Not many movies can attempt to poke fun at Star Trek, get a great number of laughs and still be fuuunnnnny on repeat viewings. This did that in spades and is due, in large part, to the contributors and simply fine performances. The best part about the acting, and it’s probably because of the way they were written, was that none of the characters were trying to be their Star Trek counterparts. I found that refreshing and most of all pressure free as the actors seems to enjoy their roles, not be hampered or confined to impersonations. They only ‘hinted’ at Kirk, Spock, Bones, etc and doing so, I believe this made the film work because each role was more of a reference to “type”, not a forced doppleganger. Still Allen, Weaver, and Rickman brought something new, fresh and almost trademark with their efforts to the role.

One thing I have been learning after watching the same movies over the years is that more and more I am recognizing talented actors who it seems I have been ignoring before now. Case in point: when I watched Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves as a kid I had my eyes on Robin (Costner) and Azeem (Freeman). But the older I got the more I paid attention to the Sheriff (Rickman) and wondered how I had missed him before. Such is the case here. Years ago I couldn’t keep my eyes off Tim Allen, (and let’s face it, Weaver’s plunging neckline) but again Rickman seems to be the best part of every movie he’s in and now I only focus on him. As Lazarus he’s “nodding to” Spock but I just love how he, of all the expo-exhausted cast, is the most fed up with his level of accomplishment/recognition. Whereas Leonard Nimoy fully embraces the Spock character, and will give the “Live Long and Prosper” phrase at the drop of a hat, when Rickman cringes as fan after fan approaches him saying his phrase. The emotion looks so real and heartfelt that you almost feel this movie is as real as the events facing the actors there in. Does that make sense?

I think everyone who worked on this film brought something special to the table and definitely took their job seriously. I mean, would Stan Winston work on a project he didn’t believe in? He and his team worked to create the make-up and special effects on Predator, Aliens, Jurassic Park, Terminator 2, just to name a few. These guys are top level craftspeople and so you won’t find them taking a job that wouldn’t challenge them or showcase their talent.  The level of detail on Sarris was so intricate that it you’ll find yourself awed by its complexity…especially if you found yourself asking “this is a spoof movie right?”.

Overall there was a subtle balance between humor and drama and although this movie was played out quasi serious, it was Warp speed humor all the way. Thinking back it really was an ensemble batch of off the wall actors but played like a finely tuned troupe. The chemistry was undeniable and I think the pairing of some actors at times, specifically Tony Shalhoub and a young Sam Rockwell, were just the right mix of odd coupling that flourished. Whenever the movie was attempting to be serious, scenes like the one where Rockwell yells, “Is there air there? You don’t know! <takes deep breath>“, gave levity to the sequences as a reminder that this is a fun movie. All in all this movie was light years beyond fun, a very respectable tribute to Star Trek replete with tons of heart and is a treat to watch every single time.

G-S-T Seal of Approval: GRANTED

Jan
21

One of my favorite elements in a film is a succesful (and memorable) monologue. When an actor can deliver a series of lines and carry the scene on the talent of that speech, it brings a certain weight to the movie. Many times in movies a monologue can consist of throw away lines or be a cheesy sequence all together, but I have assembled some of my favorites that are truly great below because they really are standout performances. They are impressive, dramatic and in a few cases stand the test of time but yet they all  exist on a level that showcases the actor’s true talents and is an example of how wonderfully imaginative lines can be without the aid of visuals, props, scenery and the like.

So here they are, my “Favorite Movie Monologues“…

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

1.) The Treasure of the Sierra MadreWalter Huston

Walter Houston won an Oscar in this film and for damn good reason. As the “prospector” he is very unassuming but as the movie plays out he shows how many varied but subtle layers are underneath that rough demeanor. I raved about this in a write up I did last year, but watching this clip makes me want to watch the movie again and real soon. Funny about this bit because it is not just a great monologue, it is also expository foreshadowing and I think that is missing from a lot of films today. Regardless, he just stole the movie.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

2.) 12 Angry MenLee J. Cobb

Most people you ask will tell you that Henry Fonda’s performance was the best in this film. Yet, the more I watch this film (usually the night before I myself have Jury Duty) I discover more things about this monologue which make me think that Cobb is the real star of this film. His intensity, his control, and his range still stand up and stand out after all these years. This is a near perfect movie not only because of Cobb, but Fonda, Warden and the whole talented ensemble.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

3.) Any Given SundayAl Pacino

I’ve been a fan of Al for years and to me his best roles to date are a dead tie between Carlito’s Way and (don’t laugh) Dick Tracy. Sure The Godfather was great but Al didn’t really shine in that movie when you have Brando, Caan and Shire to contend with.  Anyway, yes, he’s taken some terrible roles in the past decade but I still think he’s a powerhouse of acting talent and emotion. This monologue just gets me every time. In some way and kind of saddens me as I view it as his swan song since I have yet to see him do a film recently that really captures his spirit of old. But he’s Al right? What’s he got left to prove?

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

4.) Layer CakeDaniel Craig

To be fair and frank with you all, this should be followed under the category of “narration” (which is constant in Matthew Vaughn productions). Now despite that, the lines in the opening sequence aren’t as dramatic as others on this list, yet they still have a presence and weight to them. As such I believe they could be spoken without all the music, cuts and imagery and Craig could be on screen and sell the lines even more so and they’d be equally impressive…I don’t know, but I just like it.

However if you purists out there want a “true” monologue – I think this perfect one from Michael Gambon in this segment fits the bill. Short but to the point and so bloody true to life.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

5.) The Third ManOrson Welles

And last, the definitive monologue (in my opinion) delivered by the one and only Orson Welles from The Third Man. In this scene, he, on the ferris wheel, tries to rationalize his actions by removing himself from the emotional and physical closeness to the people he profits from. Simply stellar and though I’m not a huge fan of Welles, it’s tough to deny his talent and charisma, especially in this one scene. Welles is astounding!

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

So that’s what I’ve got. What are some of your favorite monologues?

Jan
20

While this movie is quickly becoming my most anticipated film to see in 2010 (right behind The Expendables and Robin Hood), this FINAL poster for Kick-Ass is icing on the cake. This was released a few days ago and if I wasn’t already sold on the film, this would totally convince me to see it.

If you don’t already know everything about the film, let me enlighten you:

Kick-Ass , the film adaptation from the comic book of the same name) is written and directed by Matthew Vaughn (of the awesome Layer Cake). The films follows the story of a boy without super powers attempting to become a super-hero. Lionsgate is bringing Kick-Ass to theaters everywhere onApril 16th this spring.

While I’m really pretty bored with and tired of Nic Cage, I don’t mind him in this (from what I’ve seen so far) as he’ll no doubt be upstaged by the incomparable Mark Strong (who is just awesome btw). I’ve never been partial to the “so serious it’s making his receding hairline worse” Nic Cage school of acting, but I do like some of his lighter fares. We’ll see, maybe he’ll be OK in this.  Regardless, I’ll still be one of the first in line to see this in April. How about you?

Jan
20

Hello World, Marc Here:

When we started Go, See,Talk! we loved writing about the things we loved writing about: namely movies. While I try to keep my self from being a self-promoter, something happened that I just had to tell you all about.

Last December, our post “Does Nostalgia Make a Movie Better Than It Is?” was featured on the IMDb Hit List. While it was amazingly flattering to be featured on their site, I never thought it would happen again. Well, it seems the fates (or just the guys running the site) thought G-S-T had something else to offer the world and so today they are featuring another post I wrote called “Novel Adaptations: Or How I Stopped Worrying About Getting Everything On Screen“.  I guess lightning does strike twice…quick someone tell Marty McFly, I’m sure he’ll want to know about that:)

Anyway, I’m just geeking out about this and wanted to share it with all you readers…and if you don’t make it to IMDb today, here’s proof that we three at G-S-T were Kings for a day..make that a second day. Shameless self-promoter you say?…Nah.

I think it’s pretty cool to be on a list that also features the great writers at Cinematical. Makes me smile anyway:)

Jan
18

One of the elements on IMDb that I pay more than passing attention to is the ‘Born Today‘ feature, and today one of my favorite actors turns 55. That’s right Kevin Costner is the big 5-5 and I thought it was worth mentioning because I am such a big fan of his. But what’s that?? Not good enough you say? Well, what if I told you that he shares the same birthday with probably the world’s classiest actor, or who Robert Osborne called, “the best of the best“. That’s right, the incomparable Cary Grant (who passed away in 1986) would have been 106…what? People still celebrate Elvis’ birthday.

“You know, punk, one day you’ll be able to squint and glower as good as I do…well maybe”

So to further celebrate here are my Top 5 favorite films from both Kevin and Cary. You know, if I ever got into films (hey, I can dream can’t I?), I think my stage name would be ‘Grant Costner’. That sounds pretty cool…anyway, here we go:

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Quick 5 Kevin Costner Films -

  1. Open Range
  2. Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves
  3. Mr. Brooks
  4. For Love of the Game
  5. Dances with Wolves

Honorable Mention: The Untouchables

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Quick 5 Cary Grant Films -

  1. Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House (“Off the Shelf” recommendation coming soon!)
  2. My Favorite Wife
  3. The Philadelphia Story
  4. I Was A Male War Bride
  5. Bringing Up Baby

Honorable Mention: Gunga Din

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Happy Birthday Guys!! Well, those are my favorites, what are yours?

Jan
18

Boy, oh boy, is this one for the ages! How can one possibly choose between “Yo Adrian!” and “Don’t push it or I’ll give you a war you won’t believe.”?? Personally I have to admit that some days I lean more toward Rocky and others I lean toward John Rambo (but deep down I am always 110% a Balboa fan).

I guess it comes down to a personal opinion: Does someone want a “champ” or a “hero”?  In both characters, he can definitely be both, but as much as I just LOVE Rocky, some days, I just wanna see Rambo take the war to them and blow shit up? Is that so wrong?? But you tell me, “Which One Are You??”

Jan
15

This goes out to all you fellow bloggers, both pros and “ham and eggers” like myself. How many of you have noticed this? You toil and slave over a very personal post, spend night and day making it absolutely perfect and yet despite the time invested get very few hits. Other times you can write something that you either didn’t put that much effort into or like writing that much and with this post, you get scores of hit on your site. My stance is that hits are hits and it means someone has found your site, may like what they see, and decide to stick around for a while. But back to why the most poured over posts get the least amount of interest – maybe it’s the subject matter, maybe it’s because you wrote about something on which few people can relate. Regardless it make me very curious why? Is it minimal site awareness, lack of post relevance, interest of subject matter, or something else??

Well honestly, it doesn’t bother me (that much, tear) as I do this because I love writing about what I like. However what I am really curious about is why some seemingly throw-away posts (yes we do post some “fire and forget” things here) get so much attention solely because of a few select keywords. It boggles my mind how something as buzzworhty as House, M.D. or Kristen Stewart can get more draws on our site when there is a plethora of places to find “fanatical” and more in-depth info all over the internet. Why is it that of all the great places on the web do people stumble to our “hobby blog” when I have tried using the same words and we don’t even make an appearance in the first 10 pages of any search engine??

So where do the hits come from? We don’t mind the traffic but get a little discouraged because hit counts on some days are high for, what we believe, all the wrong reasons. We figure hits don’t really reflect the pure interest of people searching for something we’ve written because the terms are so very broad and we don’t write about those “buzz-worthy” topics very often. In those cases, we just get what I call a “mis-hit”.  That’s a hit on our site that was really meant for something else as the searcher only stumbled here due to the fact our post matched some of their key words. Humpf, and I thought people wanted to know about what we thought was cool:P

The main reason I’m writing this at all is to voice my confusion about the things people search for and the parameters of a search engine I guess.  If people really wanted up to date info, we’re certainly not FirstShowing.net or FoxNews, or even TMZ where all three places can give you the absolute latest and certainly more official info on a topic of choice. Based on our inability to find ourselves using the same terms means there must be people out there really scouring the internet for their subject of choice. But again, I’m not going to look a gift “site hit” in mouth. I’ll admit I smile when I check the numbers at the end of the day but that smile fades just a bit when I find out the numbers come from some “mis-hits”.

Just some late night thoughts to round out the week. Anyone finding similar occurrences?

Jan
15

I’d like to thank a recent G-S-T reader/commenter for the inspiration and advent of this post.  After writing a post on “Nostalgia”, I got quite a lot of flack for saying I didn’t get Blade Runner.  I also got some (actually far more than I imagined) agreement and a good number of readers concurred with me. But where as my post was asking “Does Nostalgia make a movie better than it is?“, I believe this post can branch out (thanks to the suggestion from Stuart) and explore how going back to something we one loved as a kid but now find it is nothing like (or worse) what we remembered.

While I just adore certain elements of TV and movies from my childhood, I really hate to admit it, but some of those things not only don’t hold up over the years, but are in fact awful dreadful messes.  It kind of goes back to what I was saying about how when children and adults watch something they are watching two different forms of entertainment.

As a kid, staying home in the summer, I was bombared with reruns of The Brady Bunch, Who’s the Boss? and had to endure countless hours of Mama’s Family, but while I laughed at goofy antics and nostalgically talked about those shows with my friends in Junior High School, if I try to watch them now, I won’t even get past seeing their name on the ‘Guide’ on my cable menu before I choose something else to watch. Some things exist which even nostalgia can’t save. Such a pity because cartoons like Thundercats, and Voltron fascinated me as my imagination ran wild with their stories. Now, the animation is choppy, the dialog is borderline ignorant and the plot, especially Voltron, is so predictably formulaic that I fell my IQ drop slightly trying to give it a second viewing. That may be a tough pill to swallow as the concept (and toys) were so damn innovative and intriguing. Best to let the memories of old remain legend than face them crumble when revisiting them.

Now my main hobby is cinema and I consider myself a movie buff…I guess that’s why I run G-S-T. Now as much as I can’t stand to watch old TV shows and cartoons because of how quickly I learn that what I once put on a pedestal falls off pretty damn quick, movies are a bit different. To be perfectly fair to some films like The Beastmaster, or The Neverending Story those films weren’t bad but the effects don’t hold up to today’s standards. Prime reason: technology of the time. When those films were made, they were using truly state of the art effects (i.e. animatronics) and even perfected old methods like matte paintings and air brushing. But as technology is a fickle creature that knows no loyalty, the gadgetry of the James Bond of old can’t hold a candle to the tools he has now (even though the invisible car was dumb and outright laughable).

Even tell-tale signs of age emerge from bulletproof classics like The Time MachineBen-Hur and the quasi recent Aliens. Minatures, action sequences/choreography, and other visual effects still work but where as other times visuals enhance the film, some shoddy crafts work can take away from it in the long run.  Not growing up with Dawn of the Dead, all I see now are slow-moving, boring melted crayon zombies or like Tom Savini used a Paas “Easter Egg Coloring Set” to create the zombie make-up. But while I adore a film like The Dark Crystal, others who view it with fresh eyes may just see a “lame puppet movie“. To each their own, but as always looking back you catch more than you did the first time which sadly may be enough to kill a movie for you.

I guess it’s up to the individual viewer to decide which films “do” and “do not” hold up and to further decide to let their feelings of old (i.e. nostalgia) allow them to overlook the problems, flaws, etc. Now I’m not trying to knock these things which once gave me great joy and entertainment nor am I shunning their existence but it’s a sad, sad day when the idea of something and reality of something don’t meet on common ground.  While I cringe at the quality of the animation, effects, production or the very ill-conceived plot, the elementary dialog, something inside me can still give certain properties a passing grade.

Unfortunately I can’t go back and enjoy it as I had when I was a kid and I think that’s what upsets me more than anything. Same goes for video games, board games and most things when you have the chance to “look back” on them. However I guess it just shows the advances that we make in our personal lives, taking on new ideas and opinions as we grow. We get to the point where we find we are not the person we were 20 years, 5 years or even last year.  It’s the constant refinement of our tastes and preferences that make us who we are. Some once said “you can never go back”.  Sad how true that is, but I think those words are all I need to sum this up.

But what do any of you think? Are there films, show, cartoons that you have gone back to and been disappointed?? Do any of them still hold up??

Jan
14

Gifted writer, movie lover and fellow Cowboy Bebop fanatic at Cut the Crap Movie Reviews has nominated we humble 3 at G-S-T for the coveted Kreativ Blogger Award! Our thanks and hats are off to you kind sir! Thanks for the complimentary words and the fact that you think of us even when not frequenting our site…you filthy little frequenter:P

As with anything you receive (chain letters, Christmas cards, a title loan) there’s hefty work in return for getting something so heartfelt and special.

1. Thank the person who nominated you for this award. (Mr. Redmond, we’ve reviewed your file and it seems you’ve been leading two lives: one is a college student, and the other is the awesome editor of CTCMR where you go by the blogger alias “Aiden”.  One of these may hold a future for you:P)

2. Copy the logo and place it on your blog. (in triplicate, so take that all you one timers)

3. Link to the person who nominated you for this award. (see above for linking glory!!)

4. Name 7 things about yourself that people might find interesting.  (see below for shameless boasting glory!!)

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

  1. I’ve been to Japan 3 times and laid down in the middle of the world’s busiest intersection (in Shibuya) every time!!
  2. Have been playing guitar for about 7 years.
  3. Despite the taboo surrounding office dating, I met my fiance at work and will be getting married in less than 3 weeks!
  4. Born in New Jersey (yay, Sinatra!), lived in Colorado, Connecticut, New York, Oklahoma, Texas…where will the future take me??
  5. Own nearly 500 DVD/Blu Ray titles in my “Off the Shelf” collection
  6. My brother goes to the same college I attended (Oklahoma State University) and will be my Best Man at my wedding.
  7. While G-S-T is almost 1 year old, Pete, Rob and I have known each other for a whole decade…”and we’re the three best friends that anyone can have!

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

5. Nominate 7 Kreativ Bloggers. (see below for well deserved praise fest…this is going to be tough since everyone I know has already been nominated)

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

  1. M.Carter at the Movies – Oh, what can I say about the Mighty Mer that hasn’t already been glorified and commented on a thousand times over? For starters, Mer takes her posts (and comments) so seriously she’s like the Daniel Day Lewis of blogging…only she’s a girl. Her blog showcases expertly crafted and extremely well written reviews plus the occasional foray into short film screen writing. Top of her game and all around blogging bad-ass!
  2. FlixChatter – Ruth’s posts are always 110%.  The amount of time she invests in each post (not to mention the extreme level of detail there-in) would make you think she does this professionally. If there’s something I don’t know about a film, or some genre I have been missing out on, Ruth is there to tell me what I didn’t know I was always looking for…in film that is. Ease off boys, she’s married:)
  3. Cut the Crap Movie Reviews – Again with the reciprocation huh? Well, when I first read a CTCMR write-up I got the feeling I was actually in the theater watching the movie. His reviews will make you laugh, make you cry, make you think and he throws in the random curse word just to sell it that much better. With no end in sight, this guy feverishly reviews films faster than I can watch them. Oh, and he made a short film too…overachiever? :P
  4. The Dark of the Matinee – Hatter, like the rest of the above on this list, has probably been nominated enough times to count on both hands, but his posts are equally well written, and his comments (on a level way above flattering) are just as insightful and thought out as his reviews.
  5. The LAMB – My regards to Dylan and the bunch for not only maintaining a movie blog but also wrangling a bunch of hobby bloggers while creating a community where we can all live and play and post. Tis Zion without a cover charge.
  6. The Oatmeal – Recently got word of this site and not only are the posts obscure, deviously funny but (a rarity among the masses out there) gives you more than just a passing laugh or amusement. Whenever I need to be reminded of Grammar 101 and the P’s and Q’s of writing posts, I check out his handy “10 Words you need to stop Misspelling
  7. I Watch Stuff – One of the very first blog sites I started reading to learn about movie news. Got that and a whole lot of witty sarcasm that to this day has my sides hurting with some of their funny, memorable and “pull no punches” comments/zingers. His sister sites ain’t too bad either if you want equally sarcastic takes on all things Geek Technology related and some high quality celebrity bashing to boot!

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

6. Post links to the 7 blogs you nominate. (kind of a given)

7. Leave a comment on each of the blogs letting them know they have been nominated. (Can do Skip!)

Jan
13

Last year we wrote about the upcoming Kevin Costner, Tommy Lee Jones and Ben Affleck film The Company Men. Honestly I forgot about it and thanks to this teaser, it’s back on my radar. Well I wouldn’t even call it a teaser because aside from the SD quality, I don’t think it looks official in any way shape or form. Even the music (which I really really like as it sounds like something from E.S. Posthumus) doesn’t make me feel like this is a real movie as it looks nothing more than some fan made trailer. My guess is that this is what the production company is using to sell to a distributor.

Anyway, have a look and let me know what you think…

Here’s just a bit about the movie from our post last year:

Kevin Costner is going to be in the 2010 release of The Company Men, a John Wells films about ‘corporate downsizing’ which looks to be independently produced.  Tommy Lee Jones and Ben Affleck will also star.  Affleck’s character (looking to play the same role as Changing Lanes if you ask me) looses his job and get work in construction from his brother-in-law Kevin Costner.  Tommy Lee will play a senior partner in Affleck’s firm.

Well I’m excited but since the trailer is void of any text whatsoever, no one, not even the info from /Film or IMDB can give us a release date. We’ll keep you posted if we hear something. As of now does this look good to anyone??

Jan
13

The more I try Netflix recommendations, the more I am surprised at what I am liking despite never hearing of the titles before. A few movies on this list (which are still lesser known),  I do own and love very much, however they are mostly obscure and get a blank stare whenever I ask “have you seen it?“.  Sometimes a movie’s obscurity or lack of fan-fare can really help a movie as, most times, it will be free of hype and allow you to explore the film completely free of preconceptions.  While it won’t make every unknown a winner, I must admit it helps.

As a follow-up to a post I did last December, I give you the 2nd Round of “Movies off the beaten path“.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

The Kid – While I like the “action” Bruce Willis as much as the next person, this lighter fare was not only refreshing but incredibly fun. Nothing like Ah-nuld’s attempts at something kid friendly and genre busting, Willis shows a softer side and the chemistry between newcomer Spencer Breslin and legend Lily Tomlin makes this movie shine. Both cute and side-splitting, this movie is all heart.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

The Killing Room – A bit of a mind-screw movie, this story is smart, keeps you on the edge and is far more complex that you can imagine. A decidedly strange “mixed bag” of actors come together for a tense and taught thriller. This movie has great slow reveals and just plays mind games the entire way through. Not the headiest movie you’ll ever see but builds and builds to a truly ‘wow’ ending.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Unknown – This is like the non-gore version of Saw. I can see some elements were taken from it yet, Unknown really takes the story you think you’ve seen before and charts new territory. I was amazed with a cast this diverse and well-known, that I hadn’t heard of it sooner. Sometimes you hear about an “ensemble cast” and the movie turns out to be crap, but not this one. This plays like a clever “who dun it?” and is worth the time.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Outpost – Both “World War II” and “the supernatural” are pretty popular themes in the film world, yet whenever they are combined to make a motion picture one might think that bizarre mix would only lead to a cult following. Well in what would certainly be labeled an “anomaly”, WWII and sci-fi has helped the success of Indiana Jones and Hellboy to name a few famous examples. While this isn’t as great as those two, this is surprising. Admittedly, to see the DVD cover your first inclination is to go “Yeah, this’ll suck“, it’s actually (despite the small budget) a decent flick with a moody atmosphere and a not so predictable plot.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

K-PAX – Once in a while, a movie about an alien comes around that isn’t about lasers, space ships, or tentacles and still, without those special effects, makes you believe the actor is, in fact, an alien. Kevin Spacey is a truly talented actor and Jeff Bridges (who funny enough played in Starman) is also of the same caliber. They really sell this movie, and for a film supposedly about space, it is very down to earth. The story which follows one man (or is he an alien?) trying to find his way home (again like Bridges in Starman) is touching and makes you question, feel for him, and smile the whole way through…plus the musical score is just fantastic!

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Bicentennial Man –  Robin Williams sure has taken some wild, off the wall, and dynamic roles in the past. None of them has him playing a robot, to say nothing about a robot on a quest to become human. From Chris Columbus (Gremlins, Home Alone) his affinity for “cute with a message” makes this film both witty and emotional and something for kids and adults. While this did hit theaters many people I know stayed away from it because it looked dumb and not very interesting. Well looks can be deceiving and this movie was very well done in both visuals and the story.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Tigerland – Both the spring-board for Colin Farrell and the redeeming film for Joel Schumacher, I was impressed with how gritty, slow-paced and yet engaging that this film was. Thanks in large part to Farrell and his stellar breakout performance, if this film had starred anyone else it probably would have been ignored. In my opinion it gave one of the most gritty and intimate story of one man’s journey in the Vietnam era since Platoon.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

The Machinst – Aside from Johnny Depp (and maybe Val Kilmer) I can’t recall an actor who would go to farther lengths for his craft than Christian Bale. Not only was his shocking weight drop something to marvel at, this story was a fascinating morality tale. Set in an almost ethereal atmosphere, all elements teetered on a fine line between reality and fantasy. It gives you a feeling like you’re watching Seven mixed with splashes of The Usual Suspects.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Ravenous – After seeing Guy Pearce rock the hell out of Memento, I raced out to see everything he was in after that. While I was disappointed with a few titles, this one really shocked me. A tale about Civil War era cannibals? Really? Well as absurd as the concept was, the execution was impressive and had enough twists and great actors to pull it all off. Only don’t listen to the commentary. While the movie was good, and holds up to repeat viewings, the audio track is worthless.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Grand CanyonLawrence Kasdan just loves an epic. The time, the place, the content is irrelevant, he just has a way of telling a story with gripping plot, interesting characters and an interwoven story set amongst a vista of either landscapes emotions or both. While this has more in common with The Big Chill than with Silverado, his stories are grand but are always tied to that most important element: the human interaction. The movie feels a little dated but the message will outlast the styles and look of the film for sure.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

So take a chance on some of the above, or if you’ve seen (or own) any of these, take this as a reminder to revisit some great stories that really are “off the beaten path”.

Jan
12

For years, I have heard a number of people attempt to impersonate the incomparable Christopher Walken. Today I stumbled on a comedy skit from an Australian sketch show I have never heard of and now believe it’s a front-runner for the Holy Grail of Walken impressions.

Hailing from the other side of the world on a show called “The Wedge“, it seems I have found the most unlikely yet most spot-on Walken impression to date. First I thought Jay Mohr’s turn as Chris was awesome. Then I found many of Kevin Pollak’s stand up routines to have astoundingly accurate results. Yet, as I live and breathe, this skit has shown me just how fond the world is of Christopher Walken and how everyone wants a piece of his pie. So without further ado, here is, hands down, the best Walken impersonation I’ve seen yet…

What did you think? Funny? Seen it before? Make you laugh??