Go,See,Talk!
3 guys talk movies, music and more

Jan
07

Since I refused to watch the People’s Choice Awards, I happily came running in like a little kid when my fiance yelled, “House is up for an award!”.  I’ve  said it before, I love House, can’t get enough House, refuse to admit Season 4 of House actually happened, but I love love love love love House.  Anyway, now that I got that out of my system, I’d like to let you all know (if you didn’t watch last night) that Hugh Laurie won the People’s Choice Award for “Favorite TV Drama Actor”  Wow!!!

If you want to see the build up and the other nominees (umm, nope), watch this clip from the beginning.  If not, skip to 1:40 to see House (and the team, my what a classy individal he is) take his well earned award…The People Have Spoken!!!

And for you addicts out there, here’s some random videos of Hugh I have always liked…Enjoy!!

Jan
07

While I think I am only one of a handful of people who actually enjoyed the Stephen Sommers’ G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, I probably sit in a group of a lot fewer who are excited about a sequel. Pity. But hell, I was the only one sitting in the theater for the first movie and I didn’t mind, so I actually welcome that same setting for the sequel…especially if it has more of this guy…

Anyway, as is common practice for studios who do moderately well on a property, the knee jerk reaction (if the movie isn’t a dud) is to immediately think “sequel”. When news hit last August that it was “likely” a sequel would happen, it has taken this long to get a writer.  So much for the imptient nature of the studios, huh? Collider is reporting that a screenwriter has been selected but no name has been released yet (probably because he’s unknown and keeping his name hidden is more newsworthy than revealing someone we’ve never heard of).

Much like the surprising success of The Mummy, the two following sequels just went down hill after that. Though I view all Sommers’ films as guilty pleasures, I really hope that they are able to parlay the much grander scheme hinted at in the end into another fun movie. I’ve said before that Sommers’ movies don’t win awards but they do win smiles. Though he is not contractually obligated for a second film I hope he does return. Only, whether he does or not, I truly hope the best for this and pray it avoids the fate of the Mummy sequels.

So what do you think?  Did anyone like the first one? Does a sequel sound intriguing??

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

UPDATE: Well that didn’t take long to get out in the open.  Seems the Zombieland writers, Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick (making some headlines recently for getting to write Deadpool and Zombieland 2) will be scribing the sequel. For a bit more infor check out the story at Screen Rant.com.

Where will they take JOEs? Space, perhaps? How about a small character called “Serpentor”?? Those may be too large of an endeavor for only the second film. Regardless, this gives me more hope for a the JOE’s next cinematic extravaganza…although look how Kurtzman and Orci screwed the pooch with Revenge of the Fallen.  For now it seems a patient waiting game has begun…

Jan
06

In the past, we’ve posted some Star Wars tidbits here and while some were vaguely to moderately funny, none of them can compare to what I have in store for you. This hit the web a last month but somethings just stick with you and make you laugh just thinking about them. Now Patton Oswalt has a routine about why he hates the Star Wars prequels but this video below takes the cake in every way possible.

Someone (read genius, aka RedLetterMedia) has created a 70 minute review of the first and maybe the most disappointing prequel of the three. I bet many of you have already checked it out, but if not, please let me be the first to bring unending joy to your day as this really puts Episode I into perspective. Not only does this review (broken into 7 parts via YouTube) point out the ludicrous plot devices and rip it apart, but it will make your sides hurt with how funny (but true) the criticisms are.

For those of you short on time, take a look at this first segment. It’s really all you need to get the idea. But if you have the hour and ten minutes to finish the review, it will not be wasted endeavor.  So, for your viewing pleasure, behold, the Phantom Menace Review (part 1 of 7)

If you enjoyed that even in the least, the other 6 parts are just as good (although just a little more serious as it picks at the weak plot devices).  We at G-S-T highly suggest checking them out (they are all on the same YouTube page).  Have a great rest of the day!!

Jan
06

There are times that movie news makes me smile and today is one of them.  FirstShowing.net is reporting that Sam Mendes, the man behind American Beauty and Road to Perdition (which I just love), just might helm the upcoming Bond 23.  For more on this, here’s an excerpt from FS.net:

MGM first announced (via Heat Vision) that Oscar winning British filmmaker Sam Mendes, of American Beauty, Road to Perdition, Jarhead, Revolutionary Road, and Away We Go, has been hired to direct the upcoming 23rd James Bond movie. Despite recent concerns that the production was temporarily on hold, MGM is on track to release Bond 23 in late 2011. Bond regulars Neal Purvis and Robert Wade are writing the script along with Frost/Nixon writer Peter Morgan. Michael Wilson and Barbara Broccoli will produce. Daniel Craig will, of course, reprise his role as 007.

Later, the news was followed up by Nikki Finke with another update saying that Mendes is only being brought on as a “consultant” for the time being because once he’s signed on as director, MGM has to spend money (and they don’t have any). “The producers are working on a deal to bring Sam on as consultant with an eye to direct.” But he’s not officially signed on yet.

So whether or not he officially “signs on” I think he will bring, at the very least, some great visuals to the franchise.  That silent street scene in Road to Perdition is one of my favorite sequences in movie history, but is that kind of ‘artsy’ direction right for MI6’s (now revamped) rock ‘em sock ‘em secret agent?  Most people (me included) have been on board with the more hard edged “ruff n’ tumble” Bond and Mendes’ style doesn’t really seem relate to this new direction.  Other talented, yet unlikely, directors have shown their diversity from movie to movie (i.e. Danny Boyle and Sam Raimi to name a few) so this might actually work out OK.  Guess we’ll have to wait and see.  What do you think??

Jan
05

I know I’m pretty late to post this but I have to say that because when I first saw it, I wasn’t blown away.  Yet as I watched it again, I found it quite interesting and entertaining. For those of you who know about this film, have a second look.  For the rest of you oblivious to this project, I hope this is up your alley.  Oh, by the way, this is the REDBAND, enjoy…

After watching it the second time, did some investigating and I read some of the comments on other movie sites.  It seems this is a big budget (and non-musical) remake of Repo! The Genetic Opera. Now I haven’t seen Repo! so I was none the wiser regarding this remake and so I thought this was an original film. Amazing what you can learn on this internet huh?  But let’s say for a minute I was still unaware of the original – that said, I like the idea of Jude Law and Forest Whitaker as Repo Men. Although I have yet to see a movie with Liev Schreiber attached that actually turned out OK.  But as far as the bloody action eye candy, I am sooo on-board. Kind of makes me think of Equilibruim in many ways, well, mainly in terms of the future-noir and action.

Regardless, this all has me pretty stoked to check it out. I truly hope this sweet trailer doesn’t turn into the crap that was Blade: Trinity. Pity, I had such high hopes for that one.  Repo Men is set to premier on April 2nd this year.  Anyone excited to see this??

Jan
04

As many of you may know by now, I am a HUGE Big Trouble in Little China fan.  That film was gloriously brought to life (and later cult classic status) by legendary film maker John Carpenter. Aside from the behemoth that is BTILC, one of his other uber favorites of mine is The Thing. Now I had heard whispers last year of Universal Pictures’ idea to give this film either a prequel, a remake or a sequel. All three of them were bad news in my opinion, but still, the studio pressed on.

Last January, news surfaced that Universal Pictures had a screenplay for their prequel to The Thing and a collective groan was widely heard the world over. That news made me cringe then and thanks to this latest tidbit, I feel more or less the same. This prequel will be directed by talented commercial director Matthijs Van Hejningen shooting will begin this March.

Now for a screenplay to sit around this long in the impatient studios of Hollywood is suspicious. Some might say that it was because their plate was full of other pictures they were trying to finish. Others might say they needed this long to get the re-write. My guess is that this film’s development was kick-started as a follow up to the news of Ridley Scott’s efforts to give the his Alien film a prequel.  With all the disappointing prequels out there now, I bet Universal didn’t want to be the next in the firing line to make a poorly received film, to say nothing about one to such a popular film as The Thing.  What’s next, a prequel to The Terminator?

We got word on this (possibly ill-fated) project from /Film.  Thanks for the head up guys, but more importantly thanks for the assembly of 8 of Matthijs’ more popular and, might I add, pretty good-looking commercials.  I recommend you click here to check them out.  He’s got a talent, I’ll give him that. Despite my apparent opposition above, I’m holding out a little hope for Matthijs.  I believe this project may actually work (or at least surprise me) due to the fact that I remember another “commercial director” who went on to great things after a smash-up remake of another horror classic.

Yep, I’m talking about Zack Snyder. He started his career directing commercials (that Subaru commercial in the beginning of the Dawn of the Dead remake was his) and look how he fared. Also btw, Matthijs Van Hejningen is also attached to direct Army of the Dead, a Zack Snyder-conceived and reputedly epic undead-actioner set around a zombie swamped Las Vegas. Oh boy, I smell something similar to a little Peter Jackson/Neill Blomkamp tag team happening:)

But back to this crazy prequel idea, here’s hoping he has a good screenplay to work with or this could be trouble.  I really don’t want to lay down my “I told you so card” but we’ll see. What say you loyal Thing fans? Think this is a good idea? Anyone looking forward to this??

Jan
04

Hello World, Marc Here:

I sure hope everyone had a great holiday season and a fantastic New Years.  I know I did.  So to kick off 2010, I’ve got something new for Go,See,Talk! While thinking about the subject for our next G-S-T Poll, I have come up with what, I think, is an interesting way of finding out which is more popular (at least as far as our readers are concerned).

For years I have talked with friends,  family, etc. about which films they prefer and it usually comes down to this – People definitely seem to favor one singular role or film/franchise to another.  For example, people may be Rocky fans, but not Rambo fans.  Others may be Life of Brian fans but not Holy Grail fans.

So, as a way of getting the New Year started, here’s something that will hopefully be a fun exercise.  We at G-S-T will be hosting these smaller polls singling down two hard choices to determine which movie, character, franchise etc. that most people identify with/prefer.  On some instances I, and I assume many of you out there, will be fans of both.  But like Flickchart (or Highlander actually), “There can be only one“.  So make your choice…

To start things off, we’ll go with one of my most heated and debated choices when and ask you, with our inaugural new Poll, to take a stand and tell us, “Which One Are You??


Dec
31

Hey All, this is the last minute contribution from Rob, your friendly neighborhood foreign correspondent chiming in with my thoughts from downtown Yokohama, Japan.

In the end, the 2000’s may be most notable for two things, “comic book movies” and “re-movies“.  We’ve definitely run the gamut of superheroes and gone from the A tier hero’s the D tier wannabe’s in comic book movies and with Re-movies being the remakes/reboots/rehashes of more things than should be legally done in the space of 10 years.  With that said, mine is going to be a rather predictable list, but stopping to think of what I liked over the last ten years (and there are some hard hard choices), I realize that my favorite movies end up leaning towards action rather than anything involving anything more than minimum to moderate thinking.  But you like what you like, right?

Having gotten used to a 14 hour flight every time I go back and forth between the states and Japan, I thought of the movies I would want to make it the perfect flight.  No, I can’t sleep on planes, and if I had these movies I certainly wouldn’t have to worry about it.  Without further ado.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

1.     The Dark Knight (2008) – While Batman Begins may have rebooted the Bat, the Dark Knight portrayed perfectly the story and concepts of the Dark Knight that we’ve all grown up with, without going overboard on the “comic book” front.  An obviously wonderful performance by Heath Ledger helps, and perhaps has closed the door on future potential Joker actors.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

2.     Star Trek (2009) – This is the epitome of a reboot done the right way.  There is simply nothing else that can be said.  A feel good story that captures the essence of Star Trek, while updating it for the 2000’s, and allowing the franchise to boldly go where no one has gone before.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

3.     Transformers (2007) – Pure candy to those who grew up with the show in the 80’s.  This is a movie that I have actually watched over and over on an international flight.  Not much to think about, but Optimus Prime still gives me shivers of boyish joy when giving his orders to “Roll Out”

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

4.     WALL·E (2008) – While I know a lot of people would go for Up as the choice Pixar movie of the decade, I found Wall-E to be much better in story, and conveying to us how lonely robot’s really get, without having to rely on young kids and talking dogs as plot devices.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

5.     Snatch. (2000) – A shout out to Guy Ritchie here, and my former roommate Marc as well for getting me into Brit films.  The influence of both of them land this British style dramatic comedy on my list.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

6.     Casino Royale (2006) – There was a lot of doubt going in to see Daniel Craig as the venerable James 007 Bond, but those doubts were laid to rest by an awesome performance.  Going with more realism this time around with the gadgetry help portray Bond as less of a superman agent and more of a real person.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

7.     Iron Man (2008) – I went into this thinking, great, yet another comic book movie and came out a die hard Robert Downey Jr. fan.  Downey nailed the role, and went on to prove that comic book movies can rock when done right.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

8.     Slumdog Millionaire (2008) – An enthralling story with superb cinematography and a catchy bollywood dance song, what can go wrong.  A movie that goes to show that there is more to movies than Hollywood.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

9.     Casshern (2004) – A Japanese movie that brings the Hollywood style to an old animated series.  Very stylish, with an interesting message that somewhat gets lost in the visuals, but that’s forgiven due to the fact that Casshern kicks ass.  Pick up the Japanese version as it’s a rare release with English subtitles, and the US release has 24(!) minutes cut.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

10.  Howl’s Moving Castle (2004) – While others would perhaps go with Spirited Away as Miyazaki’s best in the 2000’s, this one holds high for a heartwarming story, and excellent soundtrack, which stand out in my mind as one of the best Studio Ghibli movies of recent time.

Dec
30

As stated in our FYI post, starting something this daunting is nearly enough to make my head spin.  Best Films of the DECADE??  What was I thinking??  Oh, it was sooo hard not to just pick ones I like and I really wanted to avoid letting cultural favorites/Oscar winners obscure the decision-making process.  But a simple voice of reason and a suggestion changed everything.  After thinking about this for a while now (starting back in October) I have racked my brain (and DVD library) and have come up with something I believe will be much easier.

Since a decade is a hell of a long time to think about and evaluate movies to pick just 10, I have to admit that my own personal tastes have changed quite a bit in 10 years.  After all, I was a freshman in college in 1999 and while I don’t have the most diverse or worldly film experience now, I certainly didn’t have it back then either. Film has evolved quite a lot in 10 years, most notably, in my opinion, the sheer abundance of CGI.  While it is almost a staple in most movies, allowing things to grace the screen which would have otherwise been impossible to create, we want to address something deeper in this list than just a flighty, superficial or “my favorite” Top 10.

The intent here is to recognize and applaud the 10 films, that really aren’t the “Best” in terms of numbers of  awards won (although some of them do fit that bill), but ones that defied expectations, thought outside of the box and became revolutionary “game changers” by making solid imprints in film history as they truly are bold, brilliant, and more importantly, crowd pleasing motion pictures.  So it is with that said I present you with my take the G-S-T Top 10 Best Films of the Decade.  From 1999 to 2009…”here, we, go

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

The Sixth Sense – Give it to an unknown writer/director to change the world with one simple (and later way overused/parodied) phrase.  M. Night (like Singer before) gave a solid entry to the film world by way of the ultimate twist ending, before twist endings became such a common occurence.  Not only was the climax worth the price of admission, the film’s composition was layered, well conceived, and M. Night became Hollywood’s IT boy, with a film that even after so many repeat viewings still impresses as he was able to pull stellar and performance s out of every single element on-screen.  The mood, the music, the acting all to notch and the ending (unless you had a “sixth sense”) was one a very few saw coming.  Sensational!

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

The Matrix – Call me shallow but I believe this is one great film that seems to get more negative attention for spawning all the knock-offs and spoofs.  However something could only cause a stir this big if it was truly great in the first place.  Movies were never the same after this film as it paved the way for more impressive and believable CGI efforts and allowed more fantastic ideas to come to the screen.  They pushed the envelope and never looked back.  Sure the Wachowskis will get flak for their less impressive and misdirected sequels (though I think Reloaded is the best of the series) but their legendary film was truly a revolution in film.  Creating such a following, it set the bar for new age action and sci-fi film, the likes of which were set by predecessors like Blade Runner and Aliens.  This film still stands up and I believe will be inspiration for the next wave of future filmmakers.  I really can’t wait to see when that day comes.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Batman Begins – The one glimmer of hope in a sinking shop that was the comic book genre.  It showed that a comic film doesn’t have to be as colorful and campy as it is on the pages to work and believable.  It just had to show that the person on-screen had heart and purpose.  That’s all you really need in a hero (not to mention a sweet gadget or two).  Batman is a bit of a misunderstood hero.  Called a “super hero”, he actually has no super powers and yet still is intimidating, powerful and achieves what most people can only dream of.  Uber talented filmmaker Christopher Nolan not only gave hope to the failing comic film market but created a wonderful mix up of origin story AND dark tone creating a envied and ill reproduced trend that left all (failed and would be) imitators scratching their heads asking why it worked so bloody well.  People would probably have The Dark Knight on their Top 10 list, but as great as that sequel was, there still would be no TDK without Batman Begins.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Casino Royale – Much like the above entry on this list, taking our hero back to their roots was necessary step but resulted in a huge  payoff.  Sometimes, in order to know where you’re going, you have to know where you’ve been.  Origin stories have become the hot thing in Hollywood, after the twist ending, the darker story, and other fads played out, but this one worked smashingly.  In a series that became all too focused on flashy gear and snippy comebacks, Royale took a grass-roots approach to everyone’s favorite untouchable spy and showed us that even the mighty 007 can be shaken, stirred and ultimately heartbroken.  Someone once said, what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, and in this case, James Bond’s evolution into the hardened unflinching womanizer he is now was really groundbreaking.  It was simple but impacting and to me the effort made film history as well as restart the franchise for good this time.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button -  Such an amazingly beautiful film and truth be told it’s this one film that made me want to start Go, See, Talk.  CGI has become the tool of choice for many filmmakers for a variety of reasons but Fincher (pushing its boundaries in each of his films) makes it all work when others’ overuse make it seem a hindrance to the performance .  Fincher’s amazing film had some of Hollwyood’s most complex CGI to date but more than that, it showed that amongst the all-encompassing digital effects, a stunning marriage of other trades (screenwriting, music, art direction) can exist while still making a pretty grounded story.  Plus the rock solid acting of Cate Blanchette and a surprising turn from Brad Pitt.  There are so few times that I can recall over this decade that I have walked out of the theater and said, “Wow, I’m so glad I saw that film“.  Well I was saying that for a solid month.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Inglourious Basterds – Quentin Tarantino, at his absolute finest, showed the world that more drama, action and intensity can be done with dialogue and table top conversation than with a feature full of explosions and car chases.  Usually remakes kind of fall flat or don’t really prove to be worth the effort but this amazing film paved new ground and had almost nothing in common with the original.  When something is so unfaithful to the original or source material you can alienate fans or confuse audiences but in this case Quentin did EVERYTHING right.  From a questionable cast (that worked), to a much more slow, sometimes gruesome but entertaining pace (that worked) to a supremely intense ending (that worked), Quentin not only paid homage to a film he has loved for years by re-imagining it, but topped all he great work he has done in the past…and then some.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

The Lord of the Rings Trilogy – Some might think the cultural connotation for “trilogy” means “3″ films – Not the case here.  Shot entirely all at once (huge gamble for New Line if you ask me, and never done before, to my knowledge), this production is really just one movie broken into three segments.  This was one series, that even with the abundance of gorgeous CGI (pushed that envelope as far as possible), many thought it would never be possible to pull off.  The tenacity of real life hobbit Peter Jackson and his visionary team, very deserving of their work, took home many Oscars (though I do think the best picture Oscar was a bit of fan service).

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

No Country for Old Men – Reminiscent of the one, the only Alfred Hitchcock, there was incredible uneasiness in every scene and intensity built, heightened by Anton Chigurh, one of film’s most minimally versed but chilling villains since The Terminator.  Paced perfectly and with such an ambiguous ending that just is a masterpiece of cinema.  I’m not usually a Coen fan but I found so much to like and love in this movie that it has changed my perceptions and tastes for sure.  Plus this film was just another (and important) step toward the resurrection of Woody Harrelson, and I’d say that’s a good thing.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Lost in Translation – Probably not entirely deserving of every bit of hype this has been given, but still just a tender and remarkable film about people.  It gave such an intimate look at unassuming characters which embodied empathetic screen representations of what I believe everyone has felt at least one time int their lives.  While some consider this an independent film, I’d like to say it feels like a documentary following real people.  I’d call this a love story without being a love story and is one of my favorite movies (that really didn’t feel like a movie) of all time.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Avatar – Now this “little” movie is probably rounding off nearly every “best of” list on the planet.  So be it a last-minute entry (and 14 years in the making), it’s well worth the wait!!  Worthy of every bit of praise it has gotten and lives up to all the hype in a way no one thought possible.  I read a review that it will change the way we movies are made and how we watch them but it’ll take some years to catch on.  Yeah, I’d believe that.  Even so, the gorgeous and glorious end product not only shows the advances in CGI, but similarly showcase master storyteller James Cameron as he too, like his movies, continually evolves, improves and impresses with each effort.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

So there you have it…the high points of a decade of cinema briefly commented on and evaluated for their brilliance and for changing the look, feel and composition of film.  After a decade long trip down cinematic “Memory Lane” I have but one question…How will these films stand up over time?  Or better yet, how will they stand up against our ever-expanding film tastes?  Well, we will just have to wait and see, won’t we.

Again, it was really hard to get this list to 10, so to be fair to the other great candidates, here are the ones that deservingly get an Honorable Mention (which play out more like my “Favorite of the Decade”): Gladiator, Memento, Shaun of the Dead, Brick, Kingdom of Heaven, The Last Samurai, The Hangover, The Wrestler, Road to Perdition and Blood Diamond. Also I’d like to call attention to just one animated film from each powerhouse animation studio, Pixar and Studio Ghibli - Finding Nemo and Howl’s Moving Castle respectively.

Man, what a sensational decade!! I can’t wait to see what the future holds. How about you at home?? Agree?? Disagree?? Care to comment??

Dec
29

Walking into the theater to see a movie that was 14 years in the making, one has to ask, “how big is the hype on this?” and further, “how disappointed will I be if this isn’t anything great?”  Well the good news is that this film definitely does well by my standards and gets my vote for one of the best movies of the decade.  Cameron continues to push the boundaries of existing technology, create his own if what’s available is insufficient to materialize his dreams and finally resets the bar with every effort.  I wasn’t a raving fanboy awaiting the “Final Coming of Cameron” but I was still pretty excited to see this.  Was it awesome? YES.  Was I disappointed? NO

PREMISE:  The story of Avatar follows Marine Jake Sulley, who after the recent death of his twin brother, is presented the option of helping continue his brother’s experiments on planet Pandora.  Jake has no scientific background but since he has the same DNA as his brother he is able to participate in the AVATAR program taking place on the planet.  With the control of his brother’s Avatar, he is given the task of attempting to make contact with the Na’vi (the native species on Pandora) to gain their trust.  In doing so the hope is that he can diplomatically convince them to allow the huge mining corporation to have access to vast majority of the sought after metal beneath the surface of their dwelling.  Jake, being without the use of his legs since a battle injury, finds more comfort behind the wheel of his Avatar than in the limitations of his wheelchair and becomes more and more enamored with and partial to the Na’vi culture.  Finding such freedom, comfort and acceptance in their world, Jake takes a stand with the Na’vi when the mining corporation (and their impatient military presence) attempt to take the metal reserves with deadly force.

HIGHS: For something that took this long to ever see the light of day, this film is deeply intricate in almost every way possible.  The visuals just wouldn’t quit, the depth of mythology on planet Pandora was astounding, the story (which did have its weak points) was pretty sound, and the action (being it was a Cameron vehicle) was simply exceptional.  Many people probably would rank the gobs and gobs of eye candy as the best part of the film and while I don’t disagree, I don’t 100% agree either. What I found extremely fascinating were the layers and layers of thought that went into first creating and then explaining the Na’vi culture.  Cameron and his crew concocted a believable world and it was evident in the flora and fauna of Pandora, the mannerisms of the Na’vi, their lifestyle and even down to their rites of passage.  For a film impossibly far beyond the technology and capabilities of our own culture and the events there-in, this film contained quite a lot of themes that I think many people could relate with and many elements came off as believable.  Now I don’t mean that I believe in the possibility of a true Avatar program but what I’m saying is that if you take the time to tell the story and lay things out, it is easy to get on board and follow.  If you are just shown something and have it forced down your throat for 90 minutes without plausible exposition you’re more than likely going to balk at things that will keep you from buying into the story.

But in regards to the eye candy, I truly could not tell the difference between CGI and real life actors/effects.  You watch a something like the Star Wars prequels and almost cringe at the level of CGI and how it feels cold, and you can easily spot the digital effects.  Even in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button and the Lord of the Rings Trilogy there were tell-tale signs of CGI which didn’t totally blend and stood out just a hair.  In Avatar, Cameron blurred the lines so damn well that I found it impossible to discern what was make-up and what was CGI when there were close-ups on some characters.  I further found myself wondering if this was a film about the future, actually sent back from the future.  OK, bit of a stretch but when the camera was zoomed in on the Jake, or Neytiri, the light, the texture of their skin and things as small as facial twitches were so unbelievably real.  One scene in particular is where Jake is being painted for a ritual and I was just floored at how real it all seemed.  Usually you can tell what is a digital effect (i.e. all the transparent computer monitors/HUD screens) but the interaction between the humans and Na’vi was just amazing.  Also, I guess seeing the film on IMAX and in 3D gave more interest and delight in the visuals bringing my appreciation level exceptionally high.

Now if you ask 100 people to use one word to describe Cameron, most people you ask (I assume) will say “action”.  True, his films are replete with action, but Cameron is smart enough to realize that you can’t have style without substance.  His films are very involving and all the explosions in the world won’t get you invested in a film if you could care less about the story or the characters.  This film, for its exercises in technology, future studies and epic story telling has quite a bit of heart behind what some might call a brainless CGI wonderland.  The action scenes were top notch and I found that some of the vehicles seemed to resemble or pay homage to his vehicles in his other movies, namely the “HKs” from The Termiantor and the “load lifter” from Aliens. Great thing to note about Cameron (among his already packed list of praises and achievements) is that when other filmmakers or screenwriters would run out of ways to continue the story or push the plot any further, Cameron just throttles the story on without seeming tired, thin or gratuitous.  Just when you think something is at its climax, he gives you another 25 minutes of full on action and few do it a s good as him.  This also seems to hark back to Aliens and it made me smile.  And FYI, after smiling for 162 minutes, your face kind of hurts:P

LOWS:  Now I don’t know if this is just a personal stigma or what, but something kept nagging at me while watching this film.  I, for the life of me, could not stop thinking of other movies in which Avatar’s plot bore more than passing resemblance.  People referred to this film as “Ferngully with a half a billion dollar budget“.  Admittedly, it was striking how some elements did play to that opinion.  Also, I found, at times this was incredibly close to the plot of Disney’s Atlantis but in a movie that is nearly 3 hours long, coincidences and the like seemed to fall by the wayside in light of a much broader, grander story than the two in question.  Once I got past that I was OK with it.  Yet somethings just seemed to be thrown in and compared to the level of detail in the rest of the movie, many elements seemed thin.

For instance, how exactly was Jake’s brother killed?  They made it seem like it was a mugging that went wrong.  But think about it.  What kind of unsavory places would someone with a PhD be frequenting when all of his other colleagues looked like they never left the lab?  Also, as part of the diplomacy (by scientists, who certainly know a lot about politics) to gain trust with the Na’vi, how did they think the “school” would benefit the Na’vi in the first place? Further, what made them close it down?  Seems like that’s some missing back story that might be of use.  Also the choice for the name of the metal they wanted to mine might have been a little too smart for most audiences…see here for a useful bit of information on why they call it “Unobtanium”.  They probably should have just made a fictitious name for it, since it can’t really be “unobtained” if they have a sample, and that one issue there might sway some viewers as it is a pretty big plot device.  Next, was it worth stating that the Na’vi are fond of bows and arrows?  Since they’re a native jungle dwelling species, it kind of goes without saying.  Worse yet is when they mention that they dip the ends of the arrows in a neurotoxin to kill their prey in less than a minute.  OK, that’s useful if you know they use it to hunt for food.  But if they shoot a human with said arrow (which is nearly 5 feet long and roughly the diameter of a Red Bull can), does it matter if it was dipped in a toxin?  Didn’t think so.  Finally, someone tell me how is that floating mountains can have waterfalls…

Also, one thing I might count on as a low but was not as off-putting as I once imagined was the score.  James Horner is a very popular and gifted film score composer, almost as great (to me) as John Willimas, Hans Zimmer, James Newton Howard and Alan Silvestri, yet I kind of have a love/hate opinion on his works.  As awe-inspiring and moving as his scores can be (The Rocketeer being his finest in my opinion) he is repetitious to a point of infuriation.  Willow, The Land Before Time, The Mask of Zorro, Enemy at the Gates, Apollo 13, Apocolypto, are all great but they all sound the same.  His work may add great emotion to a film but his overuse of the same themes he has used in countless other films is almost uninspiring.  Horner came very close to some of his old (possibly trademark) riffs and themes.  In the end he did create something new entirely for this film.  Most of the music felt and sounded very ambient, electronic at times and most decidedly “new age”, like something you’d hear on the radio program Hearts of Space.  To his credit, he gave this film something new but still he didn’t entirely break free of his old tricks and that kind of took me out of the film because it felt recycled.

RULING:  With a level of wonderment I don’t think I’ve felt since seeing Jurassic Park when I was 13, Avatar truly redefines action, sci-fi and pretty much film in general.  His level of involvement in every one of his features is so deep from conceptual design, to production development to the fact that he’s credited as an A.C.E. editor just shows his commitment to his projects.  Cameron is a master storyteller and I think he is one supremely talented individual.  His films have the perfect combination of human emotion, an extremely interesting story and dazzling effects which are all tied together with the right amount of make-believe.

Now I must admit that seeing it on IMAX in 3D may have added more to my viewing than others may have experienced.  Some might claim this was an attempt for Cameron to show off his new technological toys but with a story as good as it was, the visuals share the stage with an assembly of other elements which make this movie great.  Now this movie was truly a once in a lifetime experience in my opinion.  Not the greatest movie ever and it did have some drawbacks, however the overall feeling I left with after being saturated by the visuals and story for almost 3 hours just left me in a daze of excitement and awe.

Sadly (very sadly actually) nothing will ever be able to replicate this feeling again.  Case in point, I purchased Inglourious Basterds because of how great it was in the theater, yet my Blu Ray player and big screen LCD TV didn’t capture what I felt in that dark auditorium.  I similarly bought The Dark Knight and compared to the IMAX screen I saw it on, it paled in comparison.  I can only imagine how insignificant Avatar will seem should I buy in on Blu Ray.  It’s with that said that I’ll probably never see it again because nothing will ever compare to this viewing.  To that, funny enough, I say “Thank You James Cameron” for delivering something so much larger than life that truly, in every extent of the word, is an experience.

G-S-T Seal of Approval: GRANTED

Dec
28

You know, I don’t know if I say this enough, but I just love me some Memento…actually, all Christopher Nolan films now that I think about it.  Anyway, as much as I adore the story of ‘Leonard Shelby’ trying to find his wife’s killer and the hope that he will remember it once he’s avenged her, I have one big problem with the film.

Think about this:  A man is hit on the head.  When he wakes up in the hospital, and after the doctors assess him, they deduce that he has brain damage.  While not fully impaired due to his injury, he’ll never be the person he was either.  He, let’s call him ‘Leonard’, has damaged the part of his brain responsible for the creation and recollection of  his short-term memory.  Soooo, if the whole movie is about him trying to avenge his wife, and along the way telling everyone he meets that he has no short-term memory because of the incident…then how the hell is he able to remember “the incident”?

I’ve thought about that for years and I have a few ideas, one of which is really a cop-out (and the rest are mere derivations to make myself feel smart), but it involves progressive or deteriorating damage that happened not right after the accident but sometime just a little later.  Basically long enough for him to come to grips with everything and allow the plot of Memento to hold up.  Other than that I would call this a big plot hole.  But I’ll ask you OTNEMEM fans out there.  Any ideas on how Leonard could remember “the incident” if he has no short-term memory??  Love to hear anything you got…

Dec
25

Hello World, Marc Here:

What can I say except that this a has been one great year!!  When we first started G-S-T, we never thought that we would have so much fun with the site.  But we have and are just so glad that we’ve gotten to converse with other movie lovers and all you great bloggers out there.  Thanks to all our friends, family and new readers who make G-S-T a joy to keep running.  Here’s wishing you and yours an awesome Christmas and Holiday Season!!

In closing, I’d like to leave you with one of my very favorite clips from one of my very favorite Christmas movies…Enjoy!!

Merry Christmas to All and to all a good night!!

Dec
24

When it first came out in theaters, I ventured out in the cold Christmas Day to see the 6th and final Rocky.  Well, it’s been a few years and piggybacking on my Off the Shelf write up of the first Rocky, I got the urge to watch the rest of the series (omitting part 5 because I refuse to acknowledge it’s existence, let alone purchase it) and finished up with this respectable film that really is better than I expected and I really liked it.

While this movie comes so close the emotional impact of the first Rocky movie (by a bit unfairly tugging at the heartstrings), I believe succeeds in creating an excellent bookend to the series (making up for part 5) by ending the saga on the same note as it started. The thing that impressed me most was the fact that this film was not about boxing. This movie was about character development and continuing development of character.  Something of a re-treaded message spelled out beautifully in the first film but although it seems a little weak here, it still makes me smile.  This movie’s most important message is about doing what you have to do for yourself and to never give up.

Sly, in a back-to-the-basics approach did a terrific job with the script.  Sure you could argue that anyone who is a Rocky fan could overlook the repetitive and over-played elements, but Stallone still found ways to make things fresh. I think Lucas should take few tips from Sly, especially after what he did with his, at the time, final Rambo movie.  It’s hard to be a fan and not say that he did everything right, but it did win me over.  Everything from not naming it Rocky VI (which would make it far less appealing and associate it with many other franchises that have gone for far too long) to throwing in very minimal characters, who ended up being strong supporting characters, to the ‘how could you not have put it in the film’ fan-service of a training montage, which included the eggs, the music and of course the famous Philly Art Museum steps.

Bringing back the entire cast was a bit like going back to the well but changing things up with Adrian’s death was kind of an unexpected plot device.  Sure, Mickey died, then Apollo was killed, and we wish Rocky 5 had died in pre-production, but Rocky’s emotional distress was actually more impressive to see acted out than to have him just jump into the ring and start fighting.  His fight wasn’t revenge driven and I liked that Rocky had this deeper level that was unexplored in any of the previous installments.  Also, I didn’t really know who Milo Ventimiglia was when I first saw this but I actually bought into him being Rocky’s son, and if you look closely (still don’t know how he did it) he talks with the same lowered right portion of his lip.

I can happily say that it wasn’t just a nostalgia trip that made me, and all the rest of you, like this movie. Other series’ sequels would have just rode out the steam of the previous installments without really contributing to the series itself.  This film has the ability to take what momentum was built from the series.  Doing so definitely gave me a feeling close to what I felt from the first movie.

It was a little unsettling to see Rocky in the shape he was since it is vastly different from what our image of him is as an icon. But that’s the beauty of the film. He’s been there, done that and he’s moved on. He’s not in ‘the shape of his life’ knocking down hoards of opponents…he’s put that life behind him and he’s pretty content with who he is and who he’s still trying to be.  He’s suffered some setbacks and shows that convincingly and he, like everyone I suppose, wants one more shot to prove to himself who he is what he’s still got left.  I like that his trainer says he’s got a fighter’s chance.  Very true, because as long as you keep punching, you’re gonna hit something.  Rocky’s not fighting for a title, he’s fighting to let him know he’s still there.  I like that message quite a lot.

As I stated before, this movie is not about boxing, but about life.  An amazing finish to the story that told us to root for the underdog…and ultimately to root for ourselves.  Little cheezy but so are Rocky’s jokes.

G-S-T Seal of Approval: GRANTED

Dec
23

I saw Gattaca for the first time some weeks ago.  The one thing that I really liked about that movie was that even though it’s a quasi futuristic tale, it all had a very nostalgic and 1940s film noir feel to it.  Kinda cool since I really admire the look of that era.  Anyway, once I got past the green tint dominating the entire film (very popular in sci-fi movies at the end of the 90’s) I was very impressed with the story and how ambiguous the entire plot was.  The ending was a bit of a let down since the main plot device kept intensely building to what one might suspect would be rather satisfying ending (yet it wasn’t).  So beyond that, I found almost nothing problematic with the film save for one tiny little problem with the plot.

The more time has passed the bigger that plot hole gets to be and just screams out, “tread softly, thin plot ahead“.  In the movie Ethan Hawke’s character is attempting to pass as Jude Law’s character, all the while getting help from Jude Law to do so.  You see, (if you haven’t seen the movie) people in the future, the genetically engineered humans that most people are, don’t look too favorably on weak, infirm or anyone who was “naturally” born.  So Jude Law, due to a broken spinal column will never walk again and his dreams of flying a space shuttle are all but smashed to pieces.  Similarly Ethan Hawke (who was born naturally) can never fly, gain meaningful employment or live life without being looked down upon.  So, in a case of swapped identities, Jude decides to let Ethan pass for him so that he may achieve his dreams.

Anyway, and really to the point of this “Random Thought” post, here’s my problem.  I tolerated a decent futuristic film that really didn’t give any glimpses of said future, but hinted at it through mere suggestion (much like a Twilight Zone episode).  I didn’t mind that and actually enjoyed what they were trying to do with this film.  But I have to call some major “BS”, when you look a the following ‘futuristic’ elements: You have space shuttle travel (albeit for the most educated people on the planet), you have (even better) daily shuttle launches, you have blood and skin identification and recognition so advanced all you have to do is get near a device and your stats are wirelessly splayed across monitors around the world, finally they can use gene manipulation and engineering to make your child perfect in the womb.

Wow, makes the future seem pretty cool huh?  Well here’s my problem.  You have all that, but they can’t fix a broken spine of the main character? Quick someone call in a script doctor to fix this severely severed plot hole…oh wait we don’t have the technology yet?  Oh well, maybe in the future?  Haha, yeah right…

So that’s my one huge gripe (with what was otherwise an OK movie) and figured I’d get it out in the open.  Anyone else have a problem with that in the movie, or am I the only one?

Dec
22

Dun nun nun nun nun nun nun nun nun nun, dun nun nun nun nun nun nun nun nun nun, nun nun nun nun nun nun nun nuuuun…..dun nun nuuuun, dun nun nuuun…well for those of you thinking a couple of keys got stuck on my keyboard, that was actually my piss poor attempt to convey the Rocky theme music in Onomatopoeia.  Doesn’t quite come across as it sounds in my head or do justice to the remarkable film, but hopefully this recommendation/review might.

For all those “Italian Stallion” fans I out there, I am pleased to be writing about one of my very favorite films of all time.  Let me repeat that…of…all…time.  Never before, or since really, have I enjoyed an such an inspirational underdog film as much as I did watching Rocky.  Now was actually a B-movie when it was released, but, based solely on its message, became the underdog that was nominated for and took home multiple Oscars (including Best Picture).  It made millions cheer and to this day keeps on inspiring anyone with a dream.  Over the years, this brilliant film keeps on giving and I find more things I love about it, the more elements in the film resonate with myself and how true to life and relatable is this piece of motion picture history.

The story of Rocky is more the story of Stallone’s life and just knowing some of that back story makes the film and it’s concept so much more appealing and personable.  The tag line for the film, “His whole life was a million-to-one shot“, reads so astute and just gives me respect for the film and him as a person.  It just kind of hits you at the core when you watch this film about a person whose own existence is so pathetic and dismal but he just keeps on searching and trying.  To steal a line from Galaxy Quest, Rocky’s outlook on life despite the defeats and set backs really is “Never give up and never surrender“.  Actually the more appropriate line to use would be from his pugilist bookend to the series, Rocky Balboa, when he states, “Life’s not it’s not about how hard you hit.  It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.”  Too bad it took him 30 years to craft that gem, but it definitely is relevant in reviewing this film for sure.

Stallone, in a bold move (willing to take the role in the film at the minimum actor’s wage) would not sell the film’s rights unless he could star in it.  I’m sure you’ve all heard the stories that “Stallone only had $107 in the bank, and his wife was pregnant and he had to sell his dog” before he got his big break to do this film.  But even then this film was shot on a shoe string budget and they used almost every cent just to get the film finished.

However great Stallone (as Rocky) is in this, he’s really nothing without the amazingly talented and effective cast members bringing this (only now realized) ensemble cast to create a masterpiece of film.  With so many other boxing movies out there glorifying their titular pugilist, this film took a different approach.  The films beauty was that it got you to cheer for Rocky before he even entered the ring by simultaneously winning you over with his personality and admiring his underdog spirit celebrating his progress, not the prize fight.  It’s about personal goals, overcoming adversity and believing in yourself.  I always try to watch this film specifically close to Christmas as it does take place in the 5 weeks between Thanksgiving and New Years.  It’s sort of my own personal holiday pick me up and I love it ever so much more for that reason than staples like It’s A Wonderful Life (which is equally fantastic, don’t get me wrong).

Somethings do get better with age and sometimes age.  Succeeding years may make a movie more than it should be, or will only appeal to a later generation of film fans, but the story of Rocky is so inspiring that it reaches out to everyone.  I believe one of the main draws of the story is it’s frank and genuine bits of humanity and a level of realness that almost anyone can sympathize with.  Rocky’s own failures in life have stripped most of his pride but he still tries to chase his dreams.  A bit of an odd duck, that awkwardness and social isolation of his own life (on top of everything else not happening for him) is the one characteristic he has in common with (his almost mirror-image) Adrian.

Funny but Talia Shire, hot off the success of the Godfather, found herself nearly slumming for this role.  The budget (as well as the pay) was minimal, and so much so that the production couldn’t afford a wardrobe department.  So she, just like everyone you saw wearing any and all street clothes, was actually her own clothes.  But amid the glasses, the hats and coats, Adrain, had this quite power about her.  Hidden under the shy demeanor she showed herself as the perfect compliment to Rocky.  Now Talia is a talented actress and sometimes you can do more with a look or a gesture than you could ever do with lines of dialogue.  If you watch it again try to pay more attention to Adrian in scenes in the pet shop and on their date at the ice rink.  Not Oscar winning but it’s there.

In terms of a love story, Adrian and Rocky are mirror images but Paulie and Rocky are written in as almost the same character.  Both are down on their luck, both have nothing much to show for their life’s efforts and find that similarity as a basis of friendship.  But to Paulie, looking to make a change in his life, will do anything and , in sort of a “grass is always greener” point of view, finds Rocky’s life a little less demeaning.  So much so that he thinks that working as a leg breaker for Mr. Gatzo is better than freezing in the meat house.  Burt Young as Paulie is is just the right kind of actor to portray the kind of powerless raw emotion that embodies Rocky.  But, where as Rocky has an outlet (and now a chance at bettering himself) Paulie feels, like always, that he will continually be left behind and be even more alone than he is now.  Fighting alcoholism, fears of abandonment and jealousy (all these elements present but inferred and underplayed) his emotions and physicality are brought to life in great vividness.  Young’s performance is so shatteringly real that even Stallone seems frozen and stunned by his .  I don’t know why but I just enjoy watching Burt’s blow-up scenes on repeat viewings.  I guess it’s the combination of intensity and fragility that get me every time and it seems only Burt could pull of something like those scenes.

Burgess Meredith will forever be known as ‘The Penguin’, which is a little unfair since he is a famous and brilliant stage and screen from many years before Adam West and Burt Wards’ Batman.  As Mickey, he is more or less Rocky’s unappreciative father figure.  Ignoring but then riding him for his failures, Mickey is also upset with his fall from glory and his wasted life (see a pattern with these characters?) seems fit to want to ride Rocky’s newfound success without guilt of his past neglectful actions.  The scene where Mickey visits Rocky and tries to say he’s sorry, without actually saying it, really is a great scene.  It shows Mickey’s tough demeanor all but stripped away as he looks for help from the man he’s never give it to once.  For as loud and bitter as Mickey is in the gym his meekness is quite impressive to see a complete 180 from the gym gruffness to this timid and sad old man.

Now where would a David and Goliath story be without Goliath?  Carl Weathers, becoming a mix of Mohammed Ali and Joe Frazier, brings the one glimmer of hope to Rocky’s world in the form of a boxing event sold merely to promote his own pompous and inflated greatness.  Apollo Creed, the loud mouth pugilist is the one character in this film that really is Rocky’s polar opposite.  Whereas everyone else is down trodden and defeated, Apollo is the champ and trouts his own success with every breath.  I do like how in this film, someone’s own arrogance can prove to be his weakness.  His confidence never let’s him think that facing someone so unknown, who is s threat because he really has nothing left to shoot for, can prove to be an unassumingly intimidating adversary.  In a way, this film is not only Rocky’s rising to the challenge and proving he can overcome incredible odds, it also teaches that something (anything really) in our lives which seems so intimating and immovable, might not be as difficult or impossible as we, in our minds, make something out to be.  It’s with determination and effort that we may just go the distance, or even further, if we just give it a shot.  Of course it helps with Bill Conti’s incredibly inspiring music.

Just like today’s filmmakers are creating new and innovative devices and technology to make better movies, Rocky was no exception.  This movie, I think I can say, would not have had the memorable, no, iconic scenes if it weren’t for one said new technological achievement.  To film fans now a days, the use of a steadicam is almost as much as a given as color or sound.  OK, that’s a bit of a stretch but it is in nearly ever film and sometimes it’s inclusion can be majorly overlooked.  Steadicam inventor Garrett Brown created the first prototype and sold it to just 3 studios.  One of them happened to be MGM and this was one of the first films to use this amazing technology.  In the past, and still today even, filmmakers use a camera and track system in which they lay tracks to follow the scene with a smooth flow.  Well that’s all well and good for a slow drama, not so much the case for a sports movie.

The use of the steadicam made possible so many classic scenes, that without the advent of such a great piece of technology, you couldn’t have so many dynamic shots without circling the camera around and seeing the camera tracks.  So thanks to Garrett, Rocky has truly memorable shots and the movie succeeded far better than anyone would have imagined.  The scene in the Shamrock Meat House where the camera followed Rocky and Paulie in and around the hanging meat, not to mention the famous mean punching scene that followed.  Also, no camera would ever have been able to follow Rocky up the stairs of the Philadelphia Art Museum, thus making those steps, and the backdrop of the Museum pretty much a national treasures/landmarks.  Lastly, as gritty and in your face as the boxing was at the film’s finale it never coud have been done being that close to the actors and moving so well with them without shaking a camera or again seeing the track.  The steadicam is just as important as Stallone’s touching script, the amazingly beloved characters of Apollo Creed, Mickey, Adrian and Rocky and the ultimate inspirational music of Bill Conti.  Had this piece of equipment not been available for Rocky, I don’t think this film would have had the impact.  It’s importance is very understated.

Rocky truly was the product of a perfect storm of talents.  Many of those talents were unaware of their underlying greatness at the time, but just like Rocky himself, this film was an underdog that delivered and  just kept on giving.  Almost like a fine wine, this movie really does get better with age and there are so many great points and lessons about life that this film’s message can be understood by anyone, at any age and across all walks of life.  Simply an outstanding movie and worth of all it’s praise and more.

G-S-T Seal of Approval:  GRANTED…This film is a Great Cinemaitc Treasure

Dec
21

Now this should prove to be a tough one.  Since the Robin Hood update post we had last week, I’ve been thinking about and subsequently rewatching my favorite Sir Ridley Scott Films.  Some years ago, to me, Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven were pretty much neck and neck for my fav Scott flick.  Yet with each passing year, I am liking Kingdom better and better.  Maybe it’s because I’m partial to Eva Green, but I digress.  Anyway, take a look at the list of choices and vote for what you think is the “Best Ridley Scott Film

Dec
21

As anyone who has seen any Luc Besson film should know, he’s a master storyteller, has an affinity for both style, flair and action, and his films rarely disappoint.  The Fifth Element is still one of the most gorgeous sci-fi films out there (theres’ a reason why that movie is standard for defining the latest video technology).

Anyway, I have been a huge fan of his and while I am always on board for any of his action efforts (either writing, directing, or producing) but now am excited to see something different.  The trailer below is for his upcoming movie Les Aventures Extrodinaire d’Adele Blanc-Sec (The Extraordinary Adventures of Adele Blanc-Sec) that seems like he’s swinging into new territory, which by looks of the teaser is somewhat in the neighborhood of films like Harry Potter or The Golden Compass.

While this isn’t exactly the style of film that is in the vein of The Fifth Element (which I have been dying to see something resembling) I’m actually quite interested.  He has a way of making his movies appeal to a broad audience and his films are just flat out impressive.  This teaser is in French so I don’t know what they’re saying but I get the gist and am excited to learn more about this project.

Thanks to /Film for the heads up on this.  For those of you interested in what you saw, check out some of these great looking stills.  Also, here’s a bit of the films synopsis:

The year is 1912. Adèle Blanc-Sec, an intrepid young reporter, will go to any lengths to achieve her aims, including sailing to Egypt to tackle mummies of all shapes and sizes.

Meanwhile, in Paris, it’s panic stations! A 136 million-year old pterodactyl egg on a shelf in the natural history museum has mysteriously hatched, and the bird subjects the city to a reign of terror from the skies. But nothing fazes Adèle Blanc-Sec, whose adventures reveal many more extraordinary surprises…

This movie is supposed to be an adaptation of a popular French comic book.  I’m interested to see how Besson will fare with an “comic book movie” considering how those types of films stateside have been highly hit and miss.  For more information on Les Aventures Extrodinaire d’Adele Blanc-Sec, click this link to/Film.

Dec
21

I was reviewing the Screen Rant preview of movies coming out in 2010 and it got me thinking.  Paul Bettany is in 2 movies next year.  Interstingly enough they are both tied to religion in some way.  Then I started thinking further.  Didn’t he play a priest in The Reckoning?  Wasn’t he play a Silas the ‘albino’ monk in The Davinci Code?  Is he deeply spiritual?  Will he be the next Kirk Cameron?…only time will tell, but I thought it was worth posting this coincidence.  Take a look at the photo below…

Kind of an evolution of Paul Bettany…can someone say typecast?:P

Dec
18

While I hope referring you to the fantastic movie news site Screen Rant isn’t one of the biggest cop-out posts we’ve written here at G-S-T, but regardless we still want to give you a heads up about next year.

Vic and the gang over at Screen Rant have assembled a preview of the most anticipated films of next year.  So take a minute and see what 2010 has coming for all you movie fans out there!!  And check out some of the site’s other great posts!

I think anyone reading G-S-T should know by now that we’re most excited for Robin Hood and The Expendables.  Yet looking at Vic’s list there’s some films I had forgotten about (Legion, Paul, Inception, Priest), some I am just leaning of (Prisoners) and others which I had written off now are starting to intrigue me (Wall Street II, Predators, Unstoppable).  What are you most looking for next year??

Dec
18

In the follow up film to Sam MendesAmerican Beauty, this truly remarkable film wins me over ever single time I view it.  Personally, I am a huge fan of all Tom Hanks’ work and this is probably my absolute favorite.  Tom Hanks plays his role quite a bit more reserved that what I am used to seeing.  In doing so, he does more with looks (as opposed to pages of dialog) to convey emotions that come through so believably this was just a fine performance all around.

In Road to Perdition, Michael Sullivan (Tom Hanks) works for the Irish equivalent of the Mob and in a prohibition-era setting, his employment is really all that keeps his family alive and off the streets.  Michael is the hitman for his boss John Rooney (Paul Newman) and keeps his family (well just his kids in) in the dark as to how he provides for the family.  One night, while accompanying John’s loose cannon son Connor (Daniel Craig), the meeting goes wrong, shooting erupts and Sullivan’s son Michael Jr. witnesses his father’s handy work.  While Michael makes assurances that his son will keep quiet, Connor is not convinced and pays Michael’s family a visit to “make sure” no one talks, killing his wife and other son. Michael sets out to find sympathizers but as he finds their refusal to turn Connor over for deserving justice, he then finds that he and his son are on their own and now being hunted.  It is then Michael and his son have no choice but to take on the mob and hit to do so will hit them where it hurts them most…their wallets.

This movie may sound all about gangbusters and like some tommy gun jamboree, but as Michael and his son are essentially all on their own, this tale becomes the story of bonding between an absent and isolated father coming to know his role model lacking son.  I find it so incredible the depth that Tom Hanks has as he is able to play a hilarious comic role in one movie then turn around and portray this incredibly soft-spoken but tough and yet heartfelt character of Michael Sullivan.  I don’t think he’s done anything this impressive and dramatic (outside of Philadelphia) and so I am more and more agreeing with the quote I once hear that “Tom Hanks really is America’s favorite actor” and I think he can do no wrong.

Much to my delight, Thomas Newman scored this wonderful movie and I have been following his work increasingly since The Shawshank Redemption.  His scores have so much life and character to them that they are almost a living entity interacting with the cast.  I know that’s impossible as the score is added in during post, but the score was so haunting but with glimmers of hope that it is such a moving experience.  For those of you who either haven’t seen this film, or are not familiar with Newman’s work I’d suggest starting with this film, then go revisit Shawshank, give The Salton Sea a try, take your pick of either American Beauty or Cinderella Man and end up with either Finding Nemo (also amazing) or WALL-E.  Frankly I’d find it impossible to be disappointed with any of his work.

To me, and in some weird way, this movie paved it’s own course and became a success because of the different styles and genres it encapsulated.  This film is the perfect mob related, prohibition-era, father and son, coming of age, revenge/redemption road trip story.  Whew, tough to believe all that’s all in this film, but it is.  Sam Mendes (or maybe his production designer or DP) has an eye for setting, mood and locale and everything in this film felt nostalgic yet gloomy with hints of reverence.  This is a near perfect film and even the acting of newcomer Tyler Hoechlin playing Michael Jr. seemed to have a great level of sophistication for someone acting in his first movie.  I guess acting amongst cinema greats like Hanks and Newman, you tend to pick up a few things.

The supporting cast was also just amazing.  Even at an old age, Paul Newman can act like few in Hollywood can.  He has a power and also an approachability to his performance.  You can know him but also fear him and that’s just damn impressive.  Also Jude Law, who was in so much make up (much like Guy Pearce in The Count of Monte Cristo), he almost disappears behind his costume and played such the creepy and very dangerous hitman.  Now I never really cared for his work before but here he proved he’s got something and I’ve been partial to him ever since (he’s awesome in A.I.).  Even Stanley Tucci, playing Fran Nitti (which was just as impressive as his role of Lucky Luciano in the underrated Billy Bathgate) was just another high caliber addition to this acting powerhouse.  For as fine as the performances were, I do find one weak casting decision and it is with Daniel Craig.  His role was so weaselly and vile that casting Craig seemed like a waste of talent and they’d have been better off giving this throw-away role to someone else.

For as great as the bonding between the father and son is, there are plenty of other elements combining to make this sensational film.  As I wrote above, the sets, locales, dress and tone of the film feel like you are actually watching the characters in the 30’s.  Not having been there myself, I don’t have any basis for comparison but it feels so genuine to me that I was instantly on board and felt transported back to that time.  Kind of like looking at a Norman Rockwell painting, only with tommy guns.  Finally, (and again) my favorite part of the film was the music.  As great as it was, and I feel like I could go on for days praising it, I think my comments above got the point across.

This film really has so much going for it and I believe it is a near masterpiece.  In a film where a man rises to become the hero amidst the heartbreak and personal turmoil, the bad guys get what they deserve and the street scene near the end is one of the finest shots in the film complimented and driven almost entirely by Thomas Newman’s masterful score…wow, it gives me goosebumps just writing about it.  I think I may just throw the movie back in the DVD player and watch it again.

G-S-T Seal of Approval: GRANTED